Implicit knowledge: new perspectives on unconscious processes.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Implicit knowledge: new perspectives on unconscious processes.
Recent evidence from cognitive science and neuroscience indicates that brain-damaged patients and normal subjects can exhibit nonconscious or implicit knowledge of stimuli that they fail to recollect consciously or perceive explicitly. Dissociations between implicit and explicit knowledge, which have been observed across a variety of domains, tasks, and materials, raise fundamental questions ab...
متن کاملOn the contribution of unconscious processes to implicit anosognosia.
Mograbi and Morris present a review of the literature on anosognosia of hemiplegia and dementia, including Alzheimer's disease. Their review focuses on aspects of implicit anosognosia. The authors' viewpoint is supported by the presentation of a general model on implicit anosognosia in Alzheimer's disease. The notions have important implications for clinical management, in particular, failure o...
متن کاملNew approaches to understanding unconscious processes: Implicit and explicit memory systems
Freud viewed the unconscious as being roughly equivalent to dynamically repressed wishes, needs, and motivations. Findings from developmental psychology, cognitive psychology, psychoanalysis, and neuroscience over the past 40 years have dramatically changed our views of unconscious processes and the human mind. It is now clear that Freud’s dynamic unconscious is only a minor segment of informat...
متن کاملUnconscious Detection of Implicit Expectancies
The detection of unexpected events is a fundamental process of learning. Theories of cognitive control and previous imaging results indicate a prominent role of the prefrontal cortex in the evaluation of the congruency between expected and actual outcome. In most cases, this attributed function is based on results where the person is consciously aware of the discrepancy. In this functional magn...
متن کاملAre ‘ ‘ implicit ’ ’ attitudes unconscious ? q
A widespread assumption in recent research on attitudes is that self-reported (explicit) evaluations reflect conscious attitudes, whereas indirectly assessed (implicit) evaluations reflect unconscious attitudes. The present article reviews the available evidence regarding unconscious features of indirectly assessed ‘‘implicit’’ attitudes. Distinguishing between three different aspects of attitu...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
سال: 1992
ISSN: 0027-8424,1091-6490
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.23.11113